Controversies in Hepatology

 2012 
 2011 
 2010 


2012

  • Sirolimus – It doesn’t deserve its bad Rap(a)
    January 2012 (Vol. 56 | No. 1 | Pages 285-287)

    Greg J. McKenna, James F. Trotter

  • The use of Sirolimus should be restricted in liver transplantation
    January 2012 (Vol. 56 | No. 1 | Pages 288-290)

    Omar Massoud, Russell H. Wiesner

2011

  • The evidence supports a viral aetiology for primary biliary cirrhosis
    June 2011 (Vol. 54 | No. 6 | Pages 1312-1314)

    Andrew L. Mason

  • The evidence does not support a viral etiology for primary biliary cirrhosis
    June 2011 (Vol. 54 | No. 6 | Pages 1315-1316)

    Carlo Selmi

  • Rolls Royce for everybody? Diagnosing liver disease by mini-laparoscopy
    March 2011 (Vol. 54 | No. 3 | Pages 584-585)

    Ansgar W. Lohse

  • First-line assessment of patients with chronic liver disease with non-invasive techniques and without recourse to liver biopsy
    March 2011 (Vol. 54 | No. 3 | Pages 586-587)

    Thierry Poynard

2010

  • Glucocorticosteroids in acute alcoholic hepatitis: The evidence of a beneficial effect is getting even weaker
    August 2010 (Vol. 53 | No. 2 | Pages 390-391)

    Erik Christensen

  • The use of corticosteroids in severe alcohol hepatitis: We need to look beyond this controversy
    August 2010 (Vol. 53 | No. 2 | Pages 392-393)

    Philippe Mathurin

  • Lactate is important in determining prognosis in acute liver failure
    July 2010 (Vol. 53 | No. 1 | Pages 209-210)

    William Bernal

  • Is lactate concentration of major value in determining the prognosis in patients with acute liver failure? Hardly
    July 2010 (Vol. 53 | No. 1 | Pages 211-212)

    Lars E. Schmidt, Fin Stolze Larsen