Low virological response and high relapse rates in hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with advanced fibrosis despite adequate therapeutic dosing
Background & Aims
The impact of fibrosis stage on chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment response was explored in CHARIOT, a study of high dose peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFNα-2a) induction therapy in treatment naïve genotype 1 infection.
Methods
Eight hundred and ninety-six patients were randomised 1:1 to 360
μg (n
=
448) or 180
μg (n
=
448) PEG-IFNα-2a weekly with RBV 1000–1200
mg/day for 12
weeks followed by 36
weeks of 180
μg PEG-IFNα-2a weekly plus RBV 1000–1200
mg/day. Virological responses were assessed at week 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 (end of therapy), and 24
weeks following therapy (sustained virological response, SVR). As previously reported, there was no significant difference in SVR in the induction (53%) and standard (50%) arms, therefore the pooled study population was used for analysis of SVR and relapse.
Results
A marked step-wise decline in SVR was evident by fibrosis stage: F0 (70%); F1 (60%); F2 (51%); F3 (31%); F4 (10%) (p
<0.0001). Early virological responses were lower among F3/4 patients, including rapid virological response (RVR) (21% vs. 34% for F3/4 and F0–2, respectively) (p
=
0.0072), and the RVR positive predictive value was also lower (63% vs. 80%). Virological relapse rates were similar in early disease stages (F0, 16%; F1, 23%; F2, 26%), but increased markedly in advanced fibrosis (F3, 50%; F4, 80%) (p
<0.0001). Cumulative PEG-IFNα-2a and ribavirin doses were similar among patients with F3/4 and F0–2 within treatment arms through week 4, 8, 12, and week 24.
Conclusions
Low virological response in hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with advanced fibrosis is not explained by inadequate cumulative PEG-IFN and ribavirin doses.
Keywords: Pegylated interferon, Ribavirin, Adherence, Fibrosis, Cirrhosis
Abbreviations: CHC, chronic hepatitis C, HCV, hepatitis C virus, SVR, sustained virological response, RVR, rapid virological response, EVR, early virological response, PPV, positive predictive value, NPV, negative predictive value
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0168-8278(10)00540-4
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.04.024
© 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
