Journal of Hepatology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 441-449, March 2010

Is response to antiviral treatment influenced by hepatitis B virus genotype?

  • Sara Raimondi

      Affiliations

    • Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Patrick Maisonneuve

      Affiliations

    • Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Savino Bruno

      Affiliations

    • Liver Unit, Department of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Mario U. Mondelli

      Affiliations

    • Research Laboratories, Department of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Via Taramelli 5, 27100 Pavia, Italy. Tel.: +39 0382 502630; fax: +39 0382 526450.

Received 19 August 2009; received in revised form 25 September 2009; accepted 2 October 2009. published online 06 January 2010.

Recently released clinical practice guidelines and consensus conference statements point to the importance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotyping in therapeutic algorithms for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. This information usually comes from post hoc analyses of clinical trials which were not designed to study associations with the HBV genotype. We have performed a literature search through to April 2009 and have selected randomized clinical trials of currently approved anti-HBV drugs providing information on HBV genotypes and (i) baseline characteristics of study subjects, (ii) any response to antiviral therapy, (iii) interaction between HBV genotypes and the type of therapy. There were several intrinsic features and weaknesses in the majority of clinical trials conducted so far which make it difficult to reach firm conclusions about the role of HBV genotypes in response to antiviral therapy. Indeed, most trials were necessarily multicenter in order to reach a sufficient statistical power, but pooling together patients of different ethnicities may have revealed false-positive associations between response to antiviral therapy and HBV genotype. Moreover, endpoint definitions, especially for the composite ones, varied substantially among studies, leading to lack of homogeneity. Finally, possible interactions between the type of therapy and the HBV genotype were only seldom analysed. The present review highlights several caveats regarding current indications proposed by the major clinical practice guidelines and consensus conference statements published thus far and emphasise the need for further long term studies in the field.

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus, HCV, hepatitis C virus, NUC’s, nucleos(t)ide analogues, HIV, human immunodeficiency virus, HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma, HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen, HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen, PEG, polyethylene glycole, IFN, interferon, LAM, lamivudine, LdT, telbivudine, ETV, entecavir, ADV, adefovir dipivoxil, TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, ALT, alanine aminotransferase, PCR, polymerase chain reaction

Keywords: Hepatitis B virus, Genotype, Antiviral treatment

 

PII: S0168-8278(09)00815-0

doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2009.12.014

Journal of Hepatology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 441-449, March 2010