Journal of Hepatology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 380-388, March 2010

Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous alcohol and acetic acid injection for hepatocelullar carcinoma: A meta-analysis

  • Giacomo Germani

      Affiliations

    • The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre and University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK
  • ,
  • Maria Pleguezuelo

      Affiliations

    • The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre and University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK
  • ,
  • Kurinchi Gurusamy

      Affiliations

    • Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary and Liver Transplant Unit, University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, London, UK
  • ,
  • Tim Meyer

      Affiliations

    • Academic Department of Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • Graziella Isgrò

      Affiliations

    • The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre and University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK
  • ,
  • Andrew Kenneth Burroughs

      Affiliations

    • The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre and University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 02074726229; fax: +44 02074726226.

Received 7 February 2009; received in revised form 21 August 2009; accepted 22 September 2009. published online 18 January 2010.

See Editorial, pages 310–312

Background & Aims

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is often the preferred local ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) is less frequently used, and percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) has been mostly abandoned. Robust evidence showing benefit of one therapy versus another is lacking. Our aim was to evaluate the evidence comparing RFA, PEI and PAI using meta-analytical techniques.

Methods

Literature search was undertaken until December 2008 to identify comparative studies evaluating survival, recurrence, complete necrosis of tumour and complications. Only randomized clinical trials and quasi-randomized studies were included. Adjusted indirect comparisons were made when direct comparative studies were insufficient.

Results

Eight studies were identified: RFA vs. PEI (n=5), PAI vs. PEI (n=2) and RFA vs. PAI vs. PEI (n=1) including 1035 patients with nine comparisons. RFA was superior to PEI for survival (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.35–0.78; p=0.001), complete necrosis of tumour and local recurrence. For tumours ⩽2cm RFA was not significantly better than PEI. PAI did not differ significantly from PEI for survival (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.23–1.33; p=0.18), and local recurrence but required less sessions. PAI had similar outcomes, except local recurrence, to RFA in the direct and indirect comparison.

Conclusions

RFA seems to be a superior ablative therapy than PEI for HCC, particularly for tumours >2cm. PAI did not differ significantly from PEI for all the outcomes evaluated. RFA and PAI have similar survival rates. For tumours ⩽2cm outcome benefits comparing RFA and PEI are similar. PAI needs re-evaluation versus both PEI and RFA for tumours ⩽2cm.

Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma, PEI, percutaneous ethanol injection, PAI, percutaneous acetic acid injection, RFA, radiofrequency ablation, RCT, randomized controlled trial

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Percutaneous ablation, Radiofrequency ablation, Percutaneous acetic acid injection, Percutaneous ethanol injection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0168-8278(09)00805-8

doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2009.12.004

Refers to article:

  • Ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Is there need to have a winning technique? , 06 January 2010

    Alejandro Forner, Jordi Bruix
    Journal of Hepatology March 2010 (Vol. 52, Issue 3, Pages 310-312)

Journal of Hepatology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 380-388, March 2010