Journal of Hepatology
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 191-198, February 2010

Prospective comparison of two algorithms combining non-invasive methods for staging liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

  • Laurent Castéra

      Affiliations

    • Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (C.H.U.) de Bordeaux, France
    • Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Saint-André, C.H.U. de Bordeaux, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, C.H.U. Bordeaux, Avenue Magellan, 33604 Pessac, France. Tel.: +33 5 57 65 64 39; fax: +33 5 57 65 64 45.
  • ,
  • Giada Sebastiani

      Affiliations

    • Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, Padova, Italy
  • ,
  • Brigitte Le Bail

      Affiliations

    • Service d’Anatomo-Pathologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, C.H.U. de Bordeaux, France
  • ,
  • Victor de Lédinghen

      Affiliations

    • Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (C.H.U.) de Bordeaux, France
  • ,
  • Patrice Couzigou

      Affiliations

    • Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (C.H.U.) de Bordeaux, France
  • ,
  • Alfredo Alberti

      Affiliations

    • Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, Padova, Italy

Received 29 May 2009; received in revised form 6 August 2009; accepted 1 September 2009. published online 24 November 2009.

Background & Aims

Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis is a challenging area. Several methods have been proposed in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) but their performance may be improved when they are combined as suggested by recently proposed algorithms using either transient elastography (TE) and Fibrotest (FT) (Castera) or AST-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) and FT (SAFE biopsy). The aim of this prospective study was to compare the performance of these two algorithms for diagnosing significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in 302 CHC patients.

Methods

All patients underwent TE, FT and APRI the same day as liver biopsy, taken as reference standard.

Results

Significant fibrosis (Metavir F2) was present in 76% of patients and cirrhosis (F4) in 25%. TE failure was observed in eight cases (2.6%). For significant fibrosis, Castera algorithm saved 23% more liver biopsies (71.9% vs. 48.3%, respectively; p<0.0001) than SAFE biopsy but its accuracy was significantly lower (87.7% vs. 97.0%, respectively; p<0.0001). Regarding cirrhosis, accuracy of Castera algorithm was significantly higher than that of SAFE biopsy (95.7% vs. 88.7%, respectively; p<0.0001). The number of saved liver biopsies did not differ between the two algorithms (78.8% vs. 74.8%; p=NS).

Conclusions

Both algorithms are effective for non-invasive staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Although the number of liver biopsies avoided does not differ between algorithms for diagnosing cirrhosis, it is significantly higher with Castera algorithm than SAFE biopsy for significant fibrosis.

Abbreviations: CHC, chronic hepatitis C, TE, transient elastography, FT, Fibrotest, APRI, AST-to-platelet ratio, SAFE, sequential algorithms for fibrosis evaluation, HCV, hepatitis C virus, HBV, hepatitis B virus, kPa, kilopascal, IQR, interquartile range, AUROC, area under the ROC curve, DANA, difference between advanced and non-advanced fibrosis

Keywords: Hepatitis C, Fibrosis, Non-invasive, FibroScan, Fibrotest, APRI

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Part of this work has been presented as oral presentation at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Boston (USA), November 2–6, 2007.

PII: S0168-8278(09)00734-X

doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2009.11.008

Journal of Hepatology
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 191-198, February 2010