Journal of Hepatology
Volume 51, Issue 6 , Pages 1097-1099, December 2009

Pegylated interferon α2b versus pegylated interferon α2a for chronic hepatitis C: The unreached goal of superiority

1st Division of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS Maggiore Hospital Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, A.M. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy

published online 05 October 2009.

Special Section Editors: Peter R. Galle, Peter L.M. Jansen, Francesco Negro

Peginterferon Alfa-2b or Alfa-2a with Ribavirin for Treatment of Hepatitis C Infection. McHutchison JG, Lawitz EJ, Shiffman ML, Muir AJ, Galler GW, McCone J, Nyberg LM, Lee WM, Ghalib RH, Schiff ER, Galati JS, Bacon BR, Davis MN, Mukhopadhyay P, Koury K, Noviello S, Pedicone LD, Brass CA, Albrecht JK, Sulkowski MS, for the IDEAL Study Team.

Background

Treatment guidelines recommend the use of peginterferon alfa-2b or peginterferon alfa-2a in combination with ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, these regimens have not been adequately compared.

Methods

At 118 sites, patients who had HCV genotype 1 infection and who had not previously been treated were randomly assigned to undergo 48weeks of treatment with one of three regimens: peginterferon alfa-2b at a standard dose of 1.5μg per kilogram of body weight per week or a low dose of 1.0μg per kilogram per week, plus ribavirin at a dose of 800 to 1400mg per day, or peginterferon alfa-2a at a dose of 180μg per week plus ribavirin at a dose of 1000 to 1200mg per day. We compared the rate of sustained virologic response and the safety and adverse-event profiles between the peginterferon alfa-2b regimens and between the standard-dose peginterferon alfa-2b regimen and the peginterferon alfa-2a regimen.

Results

Among 3070 patients, rates of sustained virologic response were similar among the regimens: 39.8% with standard-dose peginterferon alfa-2b, 38.0% with low-dose peginterferon alfa-2b, and 40.9% with peginterferon alfa-2a (P=0.20 for standard dose vs. low-dose peginterferon alfa-2b; P=0.57 for standard dose peginterferon alfa-2b vs. peginterferon alfa-2a). Estimated differences in response rates were 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], −2.3 to 6.0) between standard-dose and low-dose peginterferon alfa-2b and −1.1% (95% CI, −5.3 to 3.0) between standard-dose peginterferon alfa-2b and peginterferon alfa-2a. Relapse rates were 23.5% (95% CI, 19.9 to 27.2) for standard-dose peginterferon alfa-2b, 20.0% (95% CI, 16.4 to 23.6) for low dose peginterferon alfa-2b, and 31.5% (95% CI, 27.9 to 35.2) for peginterferon alfa-2a. The safety profile was similar among the three groups; serious adverse events were observed in 8.6 to 11.7% of patients. Among the patients with undetectable HCV RNA levels at treatment weeks 4 and 12, a sustained virologic response was achieved in 86.2% and 78.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

In patients infected with HCV genotype 1, the rates of sustained virologic response and tolerability did not differ significantly between the two available peginterferon–ribavirin regimens or between the two doses of peginterferon alfa-2b. (ClinicalTrials. gov number, NCT00081770.)

[Abstract reproduced by permission of N Engl J Med 2009;361:580–593]

Abbreviations: SVR, sustained virologic response, Peg-IFN, pegylated interferon, RBV, ribavirin, HCV, hepatitis C virus

 

 The author declared that she does not have anything to disclose regarding funding from industries or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.

PII: S0168-8278(09)00635-7

doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2009.09.013

Journal of Hepatology
Volume 51, Issue 6 , Pages 1097-1099, December 2009