Journal of Hepatology
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 35-42, January 2008

Treatment of hepatitis C virus in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients in “real life”: Modifications in two large surveys between 2004 and 2006

  • Patrice Cacoub

      Affiliations

    • Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, CNRS, UMR 7087, Paris, F-75013, France
    • AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Interne, Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83 boulevard de L’Hopital 75013 Service de Médecine Interne, Paris, France. Tel.: +33 1 42 17 80 27; fax: +33 1 42 17 80 33.
  • ,
  • Philippe Halfon

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire Alphabio, Marseille, France
  • ,
  • Eric Rosenthal

      Affiliations

    • Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital de l’Archet, Nice, France
  • ,
  • Gilles Pialoux

      Affiliations

    • Service de Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Yves Benhamou

      Affiliations

    • Service d’Hépatogastroentérologie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Christian Perronne

      Affiliations

    • Service de Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France
  • ,
  • Stanislas Pol

      Affiliations

    • Service d’Hépatologie, Hôpital Cochin, Université René Descartes Paris V and INSERM U567, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Prospecth Study Group

      Affiliations

    • Prospecth Study Group list members at the end.

Received 10 May 2007; received in revised form 3 July 2007; accepted 19 July 2007. published online 02 October 2007.

Associate Editor: J.G. McHutchison

Background/Aims

To analyze the barriers to HCV treatment in HIV–HCV co-infected patients and their evolution between 2004 and 2006.

Methods

Three hundred and eighty HIV–HCV co-infected patients were prospectively included in surveys from November 22 to 29, 2004 (2004 survey), and 416 from April 3 to 10, 2006 (2006 survey).

Results

Patients in 2006 compared to those in 2004 had negative HCV RNA more often (24% vs. 12%). The rate of liver biopsy was similar (56% vs. 54%) while 24% had had a non-invasive liver damage assessment. The rate of previous treatment for HCV infection was higher (48% vs. 26%). The main reasons for HCV non-treatment have changed: HCV treatment deemed questionable (44% vs. 53%), lack of liver biopsy (18% vs. 33%), physicians’ conviction of poor patient compliance (20% vs. 30%). In both surveys, HCV treated patients were more often of European origin, had better control of HIV infection, and had a liver damage assessment more often.

Conclusions

The care of HIV–HCV co-infected patients has changed significantly in “real life”. These results underline the importance of continuing efforts to educate physicians and patients in order to increase the access of co-infected patients to HCV treatment.

Keywords: HIV, HCV, Treatment, Interferon

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors declare that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript. PH is an employee of Laboratoire Alphabio, Marseille, France.

PII: S0168-8278(07)00511-9

doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2007.07.028

Journal of Hepatology
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 35-42, January 2008